Ranking of Agricultural and Resource Economics Graduate Schools

Find An Online Program Now

The rankings below have been generated using the priorities you set. You can change your priorities or get rankings for a different field.

About the rankings »

Your Ranking of Agricultural and Resource Economics PhD Programs

Programs 1–28
RankProgramRegres QualitySurvey QualityStudent OutcomesJobs at GradDiversityTuition Remis1st Yr Support
1-1University of California-Berkeley Agricultural and Resource Economics1-31-13-875%8-2283%100%
2-4University of California-Davis Agricultural and Resource Economics (Agricultural Economics)2-82-47-1779%19-2883%100%
2-10Purdue University-Main Campus Agricultural Economics5-208-183-884%3-1283%100%
3-11University of Maryland-College Park Agricultural and Resource Economics2-112-723-2679%7-2183% 69%
3-13Oregon State University Agricultural and Resource Economics8-242-63-783%21-2883% 75%
3-13Clemson University Applied Economics2-177-161-272%*11-2371%* 88%
3-14Cornell University Applied Economics and Management5-174-157-1679%3-1583% 75%
3-14University of Wisconsin-Madison Agricultural and Applied Economics2-94-1413-2357%15-2683%100%
5-15Michigan State University Agricultural Economics5-147-178-1969%1-567%100%
5-16Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Economics, Agriculture and Life Sciences5-178-183-994%*11-2671%* 82%
5-16Ohio State University-Main Campus Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics1-66-1612-2158%7-2183% 56%
6-17University of Minnesota-Twin Cities Applied Economics4-1511-1911-2185%3-1483% 69%
5-17University of Rhode Island Environ and Natural Resource Economics3-195-1810-2072%*12-2571%* 80%
6-17Kansas State University Agricultural Economics9-234-141-292%22-2817% 89%
7-17University of Connecticut Agricultural Economics PhD15-2516-214-1673%3-1583%100%
RankProgramRegres QualitySurvey QualityStudent OutcomesJobs at GradDiversityTuition Remis1st Yr Support
7-17University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Agricultural and Consumer Economics7-188-1820-2679%3-1583% 80%
12-22University of Massachusetts Amherst Resource Economics18-2811-216-2172%*2-1571%*100%
16-21Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus Agricultural, Environmental, and Regional Economics13-248-188-1750%4-2083% 83%
16-23University of Nebraska-Lincoln Agricultural Economics15-2619-253-1850%6-2083%100%
17-23Colorado State University Agricultural and Resource Economics8-223-1220-2671%5-2217% 71%
17-23University of Georgia Agricultural and Applied Economics15-2618-2412-2372%*17-2883%100%
18-23University of Florida Food and Resource Economics20-2823-287-1647%1-283%100%
20-25University of Wisconsin-Madison Development17-2820-2627-2857%3-1283% 75%
22-26University of Kentucky Agricultural Economics23-2825-2819-2662%13-2683%100%
24-27Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Agricultural Economics16-2720-269-2064%9-2233% 40%
24-27Texas A & M University Agricultural Economics6-2019-2322-2632%15-2750% 50%
24-27University of Missouri-Columbia Agricultural Economics13-2522-2715-2362%22-2867% 44%
28-28Oklahoma State University-Main Campus Agricultural Economics14-2626-2827-2850%4-1850% 20%

Item Descriptions

Rank
A range indicating how this program ranked in 500 simulated rankings based on your priorities. Programs are sorted by their median rank. Learn more.
NRC regression-based quality measure (Regres Quality)
The NRC's measurements of overall program quality are based on 20 key variables (19 in the humanities) such as GRE scores, student support and faculty publications. To calculate the regression-based quality measure, the relative importance, or weight, of a variable was set by the extent that it correlated with programs viewed most favorably by evaluators in each field. Learn more. Your weight = 3. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
NRC survey-based quality measure (Survey Quality)
The NRC's measurements of overall program quality are based on 20 key variables (19 in the humanities) such as GRE scores, student support and faculty publications. To calculate the survey-based quality measure, evaluators in each field identified the variables that they considered to be the most important indicators of program quality. Learn more. Your weight = 5. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Student support and outcomes (Student Outcomes)
This variable is a composite of other measures of student support and outcomes, including 6-year or 8-year graduation rates (for non-humanities programs and humanities programs, respectively), time to degree, job placement within academia, percentage of first-year students with full financial support, and whether a program collects data about the employment outcomes of its graduates. The relative importance of these variables was determined by the direct assessments of some 50 faculty in each field. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Placement Rate (Jobs at Grad)
This variable shows the percentage of students with definite plans at graduation (either a job or a postdoctoral position), based on data from the student questionnaire. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: SED, 2000–2004)
Diversity in the academic environment (Diversity)
This variable shows a composite measure of diversity generated by the National Research Council. It includes data on percent of faculty and students from underrepresented minorities, percent of female faculty and students, and percent of international faculty and students. The relative importance of these variables was determined by the direct assessments of some 50 faculty in each field. Your weight = 1. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Tuition Remission (Tuition Remis)
This variable shows the median percentage of tuition remission reported by program graduates over the period 2000-2004. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: SED, 2000–2004)
First Year Support (1st Yr Support)
This variable shows the percentage of first-year full-time doctoral students who were given full financial support. In a 2006 questionnaire, programs reported the type of support received by all full-time graduate students in fall 2005. Data for students in each year of enrollment were reported separately. The reported value was calculated as the number of first-year students who received full support (from any source), divided by the total number of first-year students. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)

Data Sources

Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
IPEDS is an annual, comprehensive set of surveys of all colleges and universities in the United States. The surveys are conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics.   Learn more
National Research Council
The National Research Council conducts periodic assessments of doctoral programs in the United States. Our data comes from the most recent assessment in 2010.   Learn more
Survey of Earned Doctorates
The NSF/NIH/NEH/USED/USDA/NASA Survey of Earned Doctorates is an annual survey of all new recipients of doctorates from US universities at graduation. The average of the response rates for the 2000–2004 surveys was 92%.   Learn more
Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering
The Survey is an annual assessment of the number and characteristics of graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in science, engineering, and health-related fields It is conducted by the National Science Foundation.   Learn more
* Value is missing. The value shown is based on the average for other programs in the same field. Learn more.

The graduate school rankings on PhDs.org have been made possible by grants from The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and The Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
The National Postdoctoral Association and The Center for Science and the Media have served as the project's fiscal sponsors.