Ranking of Art History Graduate Programs

The rankings below have been generated just for you using the priorities you set on this page. You can change your priorities or get rankings for a different field.


How to Read Your Ranking

  • Programs are ranked by their score, a weighted sum of the items you chose. (Details)
  • Descriptions of each item are listed at the bottom of the page. (You can also see a description by mousing over items at the top of the table.)
  • Your weight for each item is shown beneath the item at the top of the table. Weights range in magnitude from 0 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).
  • A positive weight means that you prefer larger values for the item. A negative weight means that you prefer smaller values for the item.
  • Green values are at least one standard deviation better than the mean. Red values are at least one standard deviation worse than the mean.
  • Data sources can be found below.

Do you think these rankings are useful? If so, you can help spread the word by linking to phds.org from your own site or blog.
Here is a direct link to your ranking.
Here are some other ways to help us.


Your Ranking of Art History Graduate Schools

Click on a program to see a detailed profile
Rank
 
Department
 
Yrs
(-4)
Job
(4)
# Fac
(-4)
UG Acc
(-2)
Adjust your weights →-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
1.Art History, Northwestern University24.67.577%3.63.83.8122.830%715695
2.Art History, Johns Hopkins University23.58.779%3.53.93.853.235%705680
3.Art History, Yale University20.07.263%4.44.48.8233.010%740740
4.Art History, University of California-Berkeley19.97.760%4.24.77.2123.525%685645
5.Art History, Princeton University18.77.769%3.84.07.4173.211%745735
6.Art History, Cornell University16.26.769%2.82.92.2141.627%710675
7.Art History, Duke University15.37.366%*3.0*3.1*1.414*3.4*22%725705
8.Art History, Brown University13.78.270%3.13.23.294.615%725710
9.Art History, Bryn Mawr College13.27.275%3.53.33.266.246%635670
10.Art History, Stony Brook University11.95.066%*3.0*3.1*1.214*3.4*51%610570
11.Art History, University of Pittsburgh-Main Campus11.86.983%3.02.93.2122.749%625610
12.Art History, University of Pennsylvania11.58.267%3.53.85.0203.321%725705
13.Art History, Emory University8.37.867%3.0*3.1*3.014*3.4*39%700680
14.Art History, Washington University in St Louis8.07.763%2.22.31.492.419%730710
15.Art History, University of Virginia-Main Campus4.07.752%3.13.33.0201.638%670655
16.Art History, University of Chicago3.77.976%3.53.78.0147.540%715725
17.Art History, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill2.87.976%2.52.34.663.336%650640
18.Art History, Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus1.86.788%2.32.31.8114.258%610580
18.Art History, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities1.88.280%2.42.52.2131.170%630600
20.Art History, University of New Mexico-Main Campus1.37.277%3.0*3.1*2.014*3.4*74%535540
Rank
 
Department
 
Yrs
(-4)
Job
(4)
# Fac
(-4)
UG Acc
(-2)
Adjust your weights →-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
21.Art History, University of Delaware0.38.364%3.33.44.6143.547%610595
22.Art History, SUNY at Binghamton0.17.853%3.0*3.1*2.814*3.4*43%650615
23.Art History, The University of Texas at Austin-0.78.566%3.03.26.0151.551%630605
24.Art History, University of California-Los Angeles-1.08.459%3.53.57.0164.523%665630
25.Art History, Temple University-1.87.966%*3.0*3.1*1.214*3.4*63%550540
26.Art History, Indiana University-Bloomington-3.28.084%2.92.94.6142.785%560550
27.Art History, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor-3.49.264%3.0*3.1*4.814*3.4*57%680640
28.Art History, New York University-3.89.743%4.34.813.6250.937%665665
28.Art History, University of Wisconsin-Madison-3.86.990%2.42.12.6106.971%650615
30.Art History, University of Iowa-3.97.260%3.0*3.1*3.814*3.4*84%600585
31.Art History, Case Western Reserve University-5.46.353%2.11.83.273.368%690650
32.Art History, Virginia Commonwealth University-5.86.555%3.0*3.1*3.214*3.4*74%525535
33.Art History, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign-7.38.954%2.82.72.2104.268%675615
34.Art History, University of California-Santa Barbara-9.48.056%2.83.05.6152.953%600580
35.Art History, University of Louisville-9.99.563%3.0*3.1*1.614*3.4*81%550555
36.Art History, Boston University-11.38.733%2.72.93.4132.655%655645
37.Art History, Columbia University in the City of New York-11.99.154%4.34.813.6356.513%725715
37.Art History, Florida State University-11.98.160%1.72.12.2111.062%585575
39.Art History, University of Washington-Seattle Campus-12.810.766%*2.22.41.6111.767%610590
40.Art History, University of Kansas Main Campus-15.010.753%2.62.63.6132.069%650*632*
Rank
 
Department
 
Yrs
(-4)
Job
(4)
# Fac
(-4)
UG Acc
(-2)
Adjust your weights →-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
41.Art History, University of Maryland-College Park-16.29.956%2.32.53.8172.249%650625
42.Art History, Rutgers University-New Brunswick/Piscataway-20.28.742%3.03.07.8182.961%615580
43.Art History, Ohio State University-Main Campus-24.99.750%2.02.53.2201.073%580560
44.Art History, CUNY Graduate School and University Center-46.111.364%3.43.618.61712.248%*650*632*

Item Descriptions

Your Score
Your customized program score is a weighted sum of points for each item. The weights were selected on this page. For an item with importance weight W, a program receives W × S points for being S standard deviations above average. Larger values are better.
Years to Degree (Yrs)
Median time lapse from entering graduate school at the doctorate-granting institution to receipt of doctorate in years. Note that time spent obtaining a master's degree at a different institution is not counted. Your weight = -4. Smaller values are better. (SED, 2000-2004)
Placement Rate (Job)
Percentage of doctorate recipients from the program with definite plans at graduation (either a job or a postdoctoral position). Your weight = 4. Larger values are better. (SED, 2000-2004)
Educational Effectiveness (Ed Eff)
Program effectiveness in educating research scholars and scientists, 1993. Scale of 0 to 5, with 0 denoting "Not Effective" and 5 denoting "Extremely Effective." Your weight = 5. Larger values are better. (NRC, 1995)
Faculty Quality (Fac Qual)
Scholarly quality of program faculty, 1993. Scale of 0 to 5, with 0 denoting "Not sufficient for doctoral education" and 5 denoting "Distinguished." Your weight = 5. Larger values are better. (NRC, 1995)
Doctorates Granted per Year (Deg / Yr)
The average number of doctorates granted by the program per year between 2001 and 2005. Your weight = -5. Smaller values are better. (IPEDS, 2001-2005)
Number of Faculty (# Fac)
Total number of faculty participating in the program. Your weight = -4. Smaller values are better. (NRC, 1995)
Grad Student / Faculty Ratio (Stu / Fac)
The number of graduate students per faculty member. Your weight = -5. Smaller values are better. (NRC, 1995)
Undergraduate Acceptance Rate (UG Acc)
The percentage of applicants the institution accepts into its undergraduate programs. Your weight = -2. Smaller values are better. (IPEDS, 2005)
Math SAT Score (SAT-M)
The average of the 25th and 75th percentile mathematics SAT scores for undergraduates at the institution. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (IPEDS, 2005)
Verbal SAT Score (SAT-V)
The average of the 25th and 75th percentile verbal SAT scores for undergraduates at the institution. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (IPEDS, 2005)
Missing Values
Missing values have been replaced with the average value for all programs in the field.

Data Sources

Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
IPEDS is an annual, comprehensive set of surveys of all colleges and universities in the United States. The surveys are conducted by the National Center for Education StatisticsLearn more
National Research Council
The National Research Council conducts assessments of doctoral programs in the United States every 10 to 15 years). The data we use are from the most recent assessment, the 1995 study Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Learn more about the NRC study's methods here; order a copy here. The next NRC assessment is scheduled for release in Summer 2009.  Learn more
Survey of Earned Doctorates
The NSF/NIH/NEH/USED/USDA/NASA Survey of Earned Doctorates is an annual survey of all new recipients of doctorates from US universities at graduation. The average of the response rates for the 2000–2004 surveys was 92%.  Learn more
Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering
The Survey is an annual assessment of the number and characteristics of graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in science, engineering, and health-related fields. It is conducted by the National Science FoundationLearn more
* Value is missing. The value shown is based on the average for other programs in the same field. Learn more.
Data are for all Art History degree recipients from the institution and may include graduates from more than one program.
The graduate school rankings on PhDs.org have been made possible by
grants from The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and The Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
The Center for Science and the Media served as the project's fiscal sponsor.