Ranking of Civil and Environmental Engineering Graduate Schools

Find An Online Program Now

The rankings below have been generated using the priorities you set. You can change your priorities or get rankings for a different field.

About the rankings »

Your Ranking of Civil and Environmental Engineering PhD Programs

Programs 1–30
RankProgramRegres QualitySurvey QualityStudent OutcomesJobs at GradDiversityMinority StudentsMinority Faculty
1-3Princeton University Civil and Environmental Engineering14-472-33-2667%16-39 7% 25%
1-4University of California-Berkeley Civil and Environmental Engineering1-33-1311-5864%36-79 16% 10%
1-4Yale University Environmental Engineering7-431-11-4NA99-124 0% 0%
3-11Rice University Civil Engineering56-12716-5913-6491%*7-22 67% 20%
3-11Washington State University Biological Systems Engineering22-7310-4453-10273%3-8 50% 22%
4-16Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus Environmental Engineering19-904-234-3274%15-39 11% 17%
4-17Massachusetts Institute of Technology Civil and Environmental Engineering2-77-3315-5961%29-71 12% 6%
4-18Stanford University Civil and Environmental Engineering3-113-1564-10972%23-58 8% 4%
5-19University of Michigan-Ann Arbor Environmental Engineering15-425-2421-7657%3-9 22% 10%
6-22Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus Civil Engineering2-911-4121-6762%28-67 17% 8%
6-22Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Civil Engineering33-8614-6031-9073%7-18 40% 20%
6-24Rice University Environmental Engineering39-9918-6933-10291%*3-8 25% 14%
6-25University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Civil Engineering2-89-4382-11569%52-101 7% 10%
6-27Florida International University Civil Engineering57-12843-10281-12169%2-2 75% 29%
10-27Northwestern University Civil and Environmental Engineering9-238-2415-6867%24-61 10% 5%
RankProgramRegres QualitySurvey QualityStudent OutcomesJobs at GradDiversityMinority StudentsMinority Faculty
9-32Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus Environmental Engineering7-174-1852-9862%22-68 5% 0%
8-33The University of Texas at Austin Civil Engineering1-79-4814-4960%125-128 9% 8%
9-32University of Wisconsin-Madison Civil and Environmental Engineering8-176-3446-9558%30-72 6% 12%
10-31University of California-Davis Civil and Environmental Engineering (Civil Engineering)9-187-3637-8875%55-102 3% 5%
12-34Carnegie Mellon University Civil and Environmental Engineering10-249-3910-4373%17-51 0% 6%
11-34University of Notre Dame Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences21-635-263-2570%39-94 10% 0%
11-39California Institute of Technology Civil Engineering17-662-554-9646%27-75 17% 0%
12-38University of Cincinnati-Main Campus Environmental engineering14-404-206-3667%27-76 0% 0%
14-37Purdue University-Main Campus Civil Engineering2-622-6998-11560%28-66 16% 6%
15-36University of Michigan-Ann Arbor Civil Engineering13-4227-7352-10057%6-18 40% 12%
15-40University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Environmental Engineering and Science13-385-2774-11569%19-55 0% 5%
15-39University of Connecticut Environmental Engineering PhD36-8027-8136-9681%7-19 14% 9%
16-37Texas A & M University Civil Engineering7-1520-6428-7051%26-70 18% 9%
14-44University of Vermont Civil and Environmental Engineering60-1276-362-1865%*3-11 0% 6%
17-39Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Civil Engineering8-2318-6185-11273%63-103 14% 12%

Item Descriptions

Rank
A range indicating how this program ranked in 500 simulated rankings based on your priorities. Programs are sorted by their median rank. Learn more.
NRC regression-based quality measure (Regres Quality)
The NRC's measurements of overall program quality are based on 20 key variables (19 in the humanities) such as GRE scores, student support and faculty publications. To calculate the regression-based quality measure, the relative importance, or weight, of a variable was set by the extent that it correlated with programs viewed most favorably by evaluators in each field. Learn more. Your weight = 3. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
NRC survey-based quality measure (Survey Quality)
The NRC's measurements of overall program quality are based on 20 key variables (19 in the humanities) such as GRE scores, student support and faculty publications. To calculate the survey-based quality measure, evaluators in each field identified the variables that they considered to be the most important indicators of program quality. Learn more. Your weight = 5. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Student support and outcomes (Student Outcomes)
This variable is a composite of other measures of student support and outcomes, including 6-year or 8-year graduation rates (for non-humanities programs and humanities programs, respectively), time to degree, job placement within academia, percentage of first-year students with full financial support, and whether a program collects data about the employment outcomes of its graduates. The relative importance of these variables was determined by the direct assessments of some 50 faculty in each field. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Placement Rate (Jobs at Grad)
This variable shows the percentage of students with definite plans at graduation (either a job or a postdoctoral position), based on data from the student questionnaire. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: SED, 2000–2004)
Diversity in the academic environment (Diversity)
This variable shows a composite measure of diversity generated by the National Research Council. It includes data on percent of faculty and students from underrepresented minorities, percent of female faculty and students, and percent of international faculty and students. The relative importance of these variables was determined by the direct assessments of some 50 faculty in each field. Your weight = 1. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Percentage of minority students (Minority Students)
This measure shows the percentage of non-Asian minority doctoral students based on data from the program questionnaire. Programs reported the race or ethnicity of graduate students enrolled in fall 2005. This variable is calculated as the number of students listed as non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanics, or American Indians or Alaska Natives, divided by the total number of students whose whose race or ethnicity was specified. Students whose race or ethnicity was unspecified were excluded from the calculation. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Percentage of minority faculty (Minority Faculty)
This variable reports the percentage of faculty members who are non-Asian minorities based on data from a 2006 program questionnaire. The value was calculated as the number of faculty listed as non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanics, or American Indians or Alaska Natives, divided by the total number of faculty with specified race or ethnicity. Faculty members with unspecified race or ethnicity were excluded from the calculation. The calculation did not consider faculty allocations. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)

Data Sources

Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
IPEDS is an annual, comprehensive set of surveys of all colleges and universities in the United States. The surveys are conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics.   Learn more
National Research Council
The National Research Council conducts periodic assessments of doctoral programs in the United States. Our data comes from the most recent assessment in 2010.   Learn more
Survey of Earned Doctorates
The NSF/NIH/NEH/USED/USDA/NASA Survey of Earned Doctorates is an annual survey of all new recipients of doctorates from US universities at graduation. The average of the response rates for the 2000–2004 surveys was 92%.   Learn more
Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering
The Survey is an annual assessment of the number and characteristics of graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in science, engineering, and health-related fields It is conducted by the National Science Foundation.   Learn more
* Value is missing. The value shown is based on the average for other programs in the same field. Learn more.

The graduate school rankings on PhDs.org have been made possible by grants from The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and The Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
The National Postdoctoral Association and The Center for Science and the Media have served as the project's fiscal sponsors.