Ranking of Computer Sciences Graduate Schools

Find An Online Program Now

The rankings below have been generated using the priorities you set. You can change your priorities or get rankings for a different field.

About the rankings »

Your Ranking of Computer Sciences PhD Programs

Programs 1–30
RankProgramRegres QualitySurvey QualityStudent OutcomesJobs at GradDiversityFemale StudentsFemale Faculty
1-4Stanford University Computer Science1-21-244-9686%120-125 11% 7%
1-6Tufts University Computer Science16-8928-681-1156%6-38 42% 57%
1-7University of California-Berkeley Computer Science1-21-229-8474%114-124 12% 7%
1-7Carnegie Mellon University Computer Sciences3-103-117-4679%61-103 22% 20%
2-8Massachusetts Institute of Technology Computer Science3-53-96-4668%80-111 20% 17%
3-10Princeton University Computer Science4-143-99-5384%69-107 19% 14%
4-13University of California-Santa Barbara Computer Science5-173-167-4588%53-96 18% 14%
6-20Stony Brook University Computer Science17-388-4512-6388%10-32 23% 17%
7-26Cornell University Computer Science5-175-274-3575%78-115 14% 12%
7-31Harvard University DEAS-Computer Sciences10-354-2816-8090%110-124 17% 12%
7-27University of Pennsylvania Computer and Information Science-SEAS9-264-1810-5682%95-117 15% 8%
7-31University of Connecticut Computer Science Engineering PhD27-8317-611-970%9-31 28% 20%
8-34University of Nebraska-Lincoln Computer Science26-5712-492-2680%7-26 27% 12%
8-34Georgia State University Computer Science38-9124-671-1171%3-10 34% 17%
8-35University of Massachusetts Amherst Computer Science9-369-5012-6985%69-108 22% 12%
RankProgramRegres QualitySurvey QualityStudent OutcomesJobs at GradDiversityFemale StudentsFemale Faculty
10-36Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Computer Science17-3910-4517-7161%5-21 24% 22%
9-37University of Maryland-College Park Computer Science7-257-4417-7476%47-90 17% 15%
9-37Mississippi State University Computer Science92-11947-8510-57100%3-10 29% 24%
9-39University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus Computer Science32-6116-6414-7482%4-18 26% 14%
9-39University of Rochester Computer Science11-349-482-2396%73-110 7% 7%
10-38Michigan State University Computer Science6-288-419-4970%40-84 17% 16%
10-37University of California-San Diego Computer Science and Engineering8-277-3810-6181%83-113 17% 8%
10-43University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Computer Science3-188-4423-8170%61-102 15% 12%
10-41Purdue University-Main Campus Computer Sciences15-4311-547-5184%37-74 14% 15%
11-38Duke University Computer Science16-358-3641-9373%31-77 30% 7%
12-41University of Washington-Seattle Campus Computer Science and Engineering14-3415-5824-8381%64-107 24% 11%
13-41Columbia University in the City of New York Computer Science26-599-3943-10089%29-64 20% 10%
12-44Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus Computer Science6-2815-5928-8767%36-74 20% 18%
13-42University of Southern California Computer Science8-3011-5112-6271%28-67 19% 16%
13-44University of Wisconsin-Madison Computer Sciences10-2710-5147-9683%89-116 17% 14%

Item Descriptions

Rank
A range indicating how this program ranked in 500 simulated rankings based on your priorities. Programs are sorted by their median rank. Learn more.
NRC regression-based quality measure (Regres Quality)
The NRC's measurements of overall program quality are based on 20 key variables (19 in the humanities) such as GRE scores, student support and faculty publications. To calculate the regression-based quality measure, the relative importance, or weight, of a variable was set by the extent that it correlated with programs viewed most favorably by evaluators in each field. Learn more. Your weight = 3. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
NRC survey-based quality measure (Survey Quality)
The NRC's measurements of overall program quality are based on 20 key variables (19 in the humanities) such as GRE scores, student support and faculty publications. To calculate the survey-based quality measure, evaluators in each field identified the variables that they considered to be the most important indicators of program quality. Learn more. Your weight = 5. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Student support and outcomes (Student Outcomes)
This variable is a composite of other measures of student support and outcomes, including 6-year or 8-year graduation rates (for non-humanities programs and humanities programs, respectively), time to degree, job placement within academia, percentage of first-year students with full financial support, and whether a program collects data about the employment outcomes of its graduates. The relative importance of these variables was determined by the direct assessments of some 50 faculty in each field. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Placement Rate (Jobs at Grad)
This variable shows the percentage of students with definite plans at graduation (either a job or a postdoctoral position), based on data from the student questionnaire. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: SED, 2000–2004)
Diversity in the academic environment (Diversity)
This variable shows a composite measure of diversity generated by the National Research Council. It includes data on percent of faculty and students from underrepresented minorities, percent of female faculty and students, and percent of international faculty and students. The relative importance of these variables was determined by the direct assessments of some 50 faculty in each field. Your weight = 1. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Percentage of female students (Female Students)
The percentage of female doctoral students Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Percentage of female faculty (Female Faculty)
This measure reports the percentage of female faculty members, based on data from a 2006 program questionnaire. Faculty allocations were not considered in the calculation. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)

Data Sources

Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
IPEDS is an annual, comprehensive set of surveys of all colleges and universities in the United States. The surveys are conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics.   Learn more
National Research Council
The National Research Council conducts periodic assessments of doctoral programs in the United States. Our data comes from the most recent assessment in 2010.   Learn more
Survey of Earned Doctorates
The NSF/NIH/NEH/USED/USDA/NASA Survey of Earned Doctorates is an annual survey of all new recipients of doctorates from US universities at graduation. The average of the response rates for the 2000–2004 surveys was 92%.   Learn more
Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering
The Survey is an annual assessment of the number and characteristics of graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in science, engineering, and health-related fields It is conducted by the National Science Foundation.   Learn more
* Value is missing. The value shown is based on the average for other programs in the same field. Learn more.

The graduate school rankings on PhDs.org have been made possible by grants from The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and The Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
The National Postdoctoral Association and The Center for Science and the Media have served as the project's fiscal sponsors.