Ranking of Ecology Graduate Programs

The rankings below have been generated just for you using the priorities you set on this page. You can change your priorities or get rankings for a different field.


How to Read Your Ranking

  • Programs are ranked by their score, a weighted sum of the items you chose. (Details)
  • Descriptions of each item are listed at the bottom of the page. (You can also see a description by mousing over items at the top of the table.)
  • Your weight for each item is shown beneath the item at the top of the table. Weights range in magnitude from 0 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).
  • A positive weight means that you prefer larger values for the item. A negative weight means that you prefer smaller values for the item.
  • Green values are at least one standard deviation better than the mean. Red values are at least one standard deviation worse than the mean.
  • Data sources can be found below.

Do you think these rankings are useful? If so, you can help spread the word by linking to phds.org from your own site or blog.
Here is a direct link to your ranking.
Here are some other ways to help us.


Your Ranking of Ecology Graduate Schools

Click on a program to see a detailed profile
Rank
 
Department
 
Yrs
(-4)
Job
(4)
# Fac
(-4)
UG Acc
(-2)
Adjust your weights →-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
1.Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University55.85.386%4.28.854.24.43.6920.127%710675
2.Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago38.65.569%4.36.931.14.53.8301.340%715725
3.Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University19.56.383%4.03.48.54.35.8112.411%745735
4.Ecology & Evolution, Stony Brook University18.56.777%3.97.634.24.13.8291.651%610570
5.Ecology, Evolution, & Environmental Bio, Columbia University in the City of New York18.26.2*78%*3.5*5.5*21.4*3.5*2.465*1.6*13%725715
6.Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, The University of Texas at Austin12.76.581%*3.85.419.14.12.6541.651%630605
7.Ecology, University of Louisville12.45.4100%3.5*5.5*21.4*3.5*1.065*1.6*81%550555
8.Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University in the City of New York11.56.2*78%*3.5*5.5*21.4*3.5*15.065*1.6*13%725715
9.Ecology, Cornell University-Ny State Statutory Colleges10.86.3*71%*3.5*5.5*21.4*3.5*1.265*1.6*30%680665
10.Quantitative Ecology and Resource Mgmt, University of Washington-Seattle Campus10.16.770%4.26.435.54.31.8412.967%610590
11.Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities9.86.676%3.86.523.53.94.8661.470%630600
12.Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia8.56.171%3.76.731.03.99.6841.662%615610
13.Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor7.77.276%4.06.029.54.112.8521.957%680640
14.Ecology, Indiana University-Bloomington7.66.082%3.55.739.63.57.4271.6*85%560550
15.Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut6.45.278%3.53.28.43.44.0281.351%600585
16.Interdisciplinary Ecology, University of Florida6.35.737%3.46.830.03.61.2451.357%640620
17.Ecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill4.66.373%3.44.013.93.31.0281.636%650640
18.Ecology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston3.36.3*71%*3.5*5.5*21.4*3.5*1.265*1.6*59%*612*594*
19.Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona0.56.275%3.84.531.43.86.8262.388%565560
20.Ecology (Intercollege Graduate Program), Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus-0.96.152%3.55.614.63.34.41090.258%610580
Rank
 
Department
 
Yrs
(-4)
Job
(4)
# Fac
(-4)
UG Acc
(-2)
Adjust your weights →-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
21.Ecology and Evolution, Rutgers University-New Brunswick/Piscataway-1.96.154%3.5*5.5*21.4*3.5*2.265*1.6*61%615580
22.Ecology, Utah State University-2.16.783%3.44.210.93.44.0700.292%555550
23.Ecology and Evolution and Organismal Bio, Iowa State University-5.66.2*71%3.05.111.83.02.2251.490%620595
24.Ecology, University of Oklahoma Norman Campus-5.96.2*78%*3.13.68.73.10.8411.486%612*594*
25.Ecology, Colorado State University-6.05.288%2.95.924.63.08.0173.188%565555
26.Ecology, University of California-Davis-7.66.566%4.17.227.44.430.41971.555%615565
26.Joint Program in Ecology with SDSU, University of California-Davis-7.66.566%4.17.227.44.430.41971.555%615565
26.Population Biology, University of California-Davis-7.66.566%4.17.227.44.430.41971.555%615565
29.Ecology, Texas Tech University-8.86.2*78%*3.03.711.12.81.0261.571%575555
30.Environmental Sciences, Ohio State University-Main Campus-9.85.763%3.14.112.83.36.21050.973%580560
31.Ecology & Evolutionary Bio, The University of Tennessee-11.77.766%3.34.615.83.44.6610.944%555555
32.Ecology, The University of Montana-16.65.761%2.82.58.62.52.2210.784%532547
33.Ecology, Oklahoma State University-Main Campus-17.06.2*78%*2.94.813.72.41.4213.151%565555
34.Environmental and Forest Biology, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry-19.46.747%2.96.624.82.31.6122.266%570565
35.Ecological Sciences, Old Dominion University-21.76.783%2.34.14.22.23.4141.169%530530
36.Ecology, Kent State University-Kent Campus-34.78.078%*2.34.310.11.91.681.494%515515
37.Ecology, University of North Texas-37.66.2*78%*2.24.77.21.70.8114.369%555545

Item Descriptions

Your Score
Your customized program score is a weighted sum of points for each item. The weights were selected on this page. For an item with importance weight W, a program receives W × S points for being S standard deviations above average. Larger values are better.
Years to Degree (Yrs)
Median time lapse from entering graduate school at the doctorate-granting institution to receipt of doctorate in years. Note that time spent obtaining a master's degree at a different institution is not counted. Your weight = -4. Smaller values are better. (SED, 2000-2004)
Placement Rate (Job)
Percentage of doctorate recipients from the program with definite plans at graduation (either a job or a postdoctoral position). Your weight = 4. Larger values are better. (SED, 2000-2004)
Educational Effectiveness (Ed Eff)
Program effectiveness in educating research scholars and scientists, 1993. Scale of 0 to 5, with 0 denoting "Not Effective" and 5 denoting "Extremely Effective." Your weight = 5. Larger values are better. (NRC, 1995)
Publications per Faculty Member (Pub / Fac)
The ratio of the number of program publications in the period 1988-1992 to the number of program faculty. Your weight = 3. Larger values are better. (NRC, 1995)
Citations per Faculty Member (Cite / Fac)
The ratio of the number of citations of program publications in the period 1988-1992 to the number of program faculty. Your weight = 3. Larger values are better. (NRC, 1995)
Faculty Quality (Fac Qual)
Scholarly quality of program faculty, 1993. Scale of 0 to 5, with 0 denoting "Not sufficient for doctoral education" and 5 denoting "Distinguished." Your weight = 5. Larger values are better. (NRC, 1995)
Doctorates Granted per Year (Deg / Yr)
The average number of doctorates granted by the program per year between 2001 and 2005. Your weight = -5. Smaller values are better. (IPEDS, 2001-2005)
Number of Faculty (# Fac)
Total number of faculty participating in the program. Your weight = -4. Smaller values are better. (NRC, 1995)
Grad Student / Faculty Ratio (Stu / Fac)
The number of graduate students per faculty member. Your weight = -5. Smaller values are better. (NRC, 1995)
Undergraduate Acceptance Rate (UG Acc)
The percentage of applicants the institution accepts into its undergraduate programs. Your weight = -2. Smaller values are better. (IPEDS, 2005)
Math SAT Score (SAT-M)
The average of the 25th and 75th percentile mathematics SAT scores for undergraduates at the institution. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (IPEDS, 2005)
Verbal SAT Score (SAT-V)
The average of the 25th and 75th percentile verbal SAT scores for undergraduates at the institution. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (IPEDS, 2005)
Missing Values
Missing values have been replaced with the average value for all programs in the field.

Data Sources

Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
IPEDS is an annual, comprehensive set of surveys of all colleges and universities in the United States. The surveys are conducted by the National Center for Education StatisticsLearn more
National Research Council
The National Research Council conducts assessments of doctoral programs in the United States every 10 to 15 years). The data we use are from the most recent assessment, the 1995 study Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Learn more about the NRC study's methods here; order a copy here. The next NRC assessment is scheduled for release in Summer 2009.  Learn more
Survey of Earned Doctorates
The NSF/NIH/NEH/USED/USDA/NASA Survey of Earned Doctorates is an annual survey of all new recipients of doctorates from US universities at graduation. The average of the response rates for the 2000–2004 surveys was 92%.  Learn more
Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering
The Survey is an annual assessment of the number and characteristics of graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in science, engineering, and health-related fields. It is conducted by the National Science FoundationLearn more
* Value is missing. The value shown is based on the average for other programs in the same field. Learn more.
Data are for all Ecology degree recipients from the institution and may include graduates from more than one program.
The graduate school rankings on PhDs.org have been made possible by
grants from The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and The Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
The Center for Science and the Media served as the project's fiscal sponsor.