Ranking of Forestry and Forest Sciences Graduate Schools

Find An Online Program Now

The rankings below have been generated using the priorities you set. You can change your priorities or get rankings for a different field.

About the rankings »

Your Ranking of Forestry and Forest Sciences PhD Programs

Programs 1–30
RankProgramRegres QualitySurvey QualityStudent OutcomesJobs at GradDiversityTuition Remis1st Yr Support
1-2University of Wisconsin-Madison Forestry1-31-29-2667%15-2683%100%
2-10Michigan Technological University Forest Molecular Genetics and Biotechnology5-251-31-1860%2-483%100%
2-9Oregon State University Forest Science4-112-118-2675%19-2883%100%
2-8University of Minnesota-Twin Cities Natural Resource Science and Management3-114-193-1984%13-2283%100%
2-9Purdue University-Main Campus Forestry and Natural Resources5-143-168-2778%2-383%100%
2-10University of Washington-Seattle Campus Forest Resources1-54-177-2577%9-1750%100%
2-11Yale University Forestry and Environmental Studies1-43-116-2347%4-1083%100%
4-15Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Forestry5-154-191-1366%23-2983%100%
5-16Michigan Technological University Forest Science11-243-134-2160%5-1483%100%
5-17University of Georgia Forest Resources3-114-2018-2968%20-2883%100%
8-21Oregon State University Forest Resources14-279-272-1975%15-2583%100%
8-23Clemson University Forest Resources14-2712-291-2078%16-2667%100%
9-22Michigan State University Forestry8-225-2112-2663%8-1883% 86%
8-22Oregon State University Forest Engineering13-277-262-1275%32-3383% 83%
9-25North Carolina State University at Raleigh Wood and Paper Science7-2411-293-2968%9-2583%100%
RankProgramRegres QualitySurvey QualityStudent OutcomesJobs at GradDiversityTuition Remis1st Yr Support
9-23Oregon State University Wood Science7-217-2514-2775%19-2983% 75%
11-25Mississippi State University Forest Products (degree: PhD in Forest Resources)21-3110-281-1368%8-1683%100%
10-24Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus Forest Resources5-207-271-1755%28-3283%100%
9-25Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Forest Products10-2912-302-1666%15-2883%100%
12-25North Carolina State University at Raleigh Forestry4-1413-2926-3268%11-2283% 80%
10-26Texas A & M University Forestry11-284-245-2862%1-10%100%
12-26University of Massachusetts Amherst Forest Resources15-3115-2913-3067%29-3283%100%
11-27University of Missouri-Columbia Forestry17-3111-301-2165%14-2483%100%
16-28University of Florida Forest Resources and Conservation11-2320-319-2754%3-583%100%
17-29Mississippi State University Forestry (degree: PhD in Forest Resources)26-3315-311-1568%31-3383% 80%
17-29University of Idaho Forest Resources23-335-248-2472%5-1317% 83%
24-31Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Forestry9-218-2616-2957%4-120% 67%
24-31Texas A & M University Rangeland Ecology and Management7-2516-3116-2962%8-190% 80%
23-31The University of Tennessee Natural Resources24-3325-3214-3067%23-3083%100%
25-32Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus Wildlife and Fisheries Science14-3210-3028-3255%25-3183% 50%

Item Descriptions

Rank
A range indicating how this program ranked in 500 simulated rankings based on your priorities. Programs are sorted by their median rank. Learn more.
NRC regression-based quality measure (Regres Quality)
The NRC's measurements of overall program quality are based on 20 key variables (19 in the humanities) such as GRE scores, student support and faculty publications. To calculate the regression-based quality measure, the relative importance, or weight, of a variable was set by the extent that it correlated with programs viewed most favorably by evaluators in each field. Learn more. Your weight = 3. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
NRC survey-based quality measure (Survey Quality)
The NRC's measurements of overall program quality are based on 20 key variables (19 in the humanities) such as GRE scores, student support and faculty publications. To calculate the survey-based quality measure, evaluators in each field identified the variables that they considered to be the most important indicators of program quality. Learn more. Your weight = 5. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Student support and outcomes (Student Outcomes)
This variable is a composite of other measures of student support and outcomes, including 6-year or 8-year graduation rates (for non-humanities programs and humanities programs, respectively), time to degree, job placement within academia, percentage of first-year students with full financial support, and whether a program collects data about the employment outcomes of its graduates. The relative importance of these variables was determined by the direct assessments of some 50 faculty in each field. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Placement Rate (Jobs at Grad)
This variable shows the percentage of students with definite plans at graduation (either a job or a postdoctoral position), based on data from the student questionnaire. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: SED, 2000–2004)
Diversity in the academic environment (Diversity)
This variable shows a composite measure of diversity generated by the National Research Council. It includes data on percent of faculty and students from underrepresented minorities, percent of female faculty and students, and percent of international faculty and students. The relative importance of these variables was determined by the direct assessments of some 50 faculty in each field. Your weight = 1. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Tuition Remission (Tuition Remis)
This variable shows the median percentage of tuition remission reported by program graduates over the period 2000-2004. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: SED, 2000–2004)
First Year Support (1st Yr Support)
This variable shows the percentage of first-year full-time doctoral students who were given full financial support. In a 2006 questionnaire, programs reported the type of support received by all full-time graduate students in fall 2005. Data for students in each year of enrollment were reported separately. The reported value was calculated as the number of first-year students who received full support (from any source), divided by the total number of first-year students. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)

Data Sources

Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
IPEDS is an annual, comprehensive set of surveys of all colleges and universities in the United States. The surveys are conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics.   Learn more
National Research Council
The National Research Council conducts periodic assessments of doctoral programs in the United States. Our data comes from the most recent assessment in 2010.   Learn more
Survey of Earned Doctorates
The NSF/NIH/NEH/USED/USDA/NASA Survey of Earned Doctorates is an annual survey of all new recipients of doctorates from US universities at graduation. The average of the response rates for the 2000–2004 surveys was 92%.   Learn more
Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering
The Survey is an annual assessment of the number and characteristics of graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in science, engineering, and health-related fields It is conducted by the National Science Foundation.   Learn more
* Value is missing. The value shown is based on the average for other programs in the same field. Learn more.

The graduate school rankings on PhDs.org have been made possible by grants from The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and The Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
The National Postdoctoral Association and The Center for Science and the Media have served as the project's fiscal sponsors.