Ranking of Forestry and Forest Sciences Graduate Schools

Find An Online Program Now

The rankings below have been generated using the priorities you set. You can change your priorities or get rankings for a different field.

About the rankings »

Your Ranking of Forestry and Forest Sciences PhD Programs

Programs 1–30
RankProgramRegres QualitySurvey QualityStudent OutcomesJobs at GradDiversityIn-State TuitionRoom Board
1-1University of Wisconsin-Madison Forestry1-31-29-2667%15-26$9,500$8,040
2-9University of Minnesota-Twin Cities Natural Resource Science and Management3-114-193-1984%13-22$11,212$7,392
2-11Michigan Technological University Forest Molecular Genetics and Biotechnology5-251-31-1860%2-4$10,710NA
2-10Oregon State University Forest Science4-112-118-2675%19-28$9,774$8,352
2-10Purdue University-Main Campus Forestry and Natural Resources5-143-168-2778%2-3$8,183$8,710
3-13University of Washington-Seattle Campus Forest Resources1-54-177-2577%9-17$10,160$12,876
3-13Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Forestry5-154-191-1366%23-29$8,262$6,580
3-15Clemson University Forest Resources14-2712-291-2078%16-26$6,168$2,620
4-18University of Georgia Forest Resources3-114-2018-2968%20-28$6,000NA
5-18Michigan Technological University Forest Science11-243-134-2160%5-14$10,710NA
4-19Texas A & M University Forestry11-284-245-2862%1-1$5,322$8,039
6-22University of Idaho Forest Resources23-335-248-2472%5-13$0$7,242
8-24Oregon State University Wood Science7-217-2514-2775%19-29$9,774$8,352
8-24Oregon State University Forest Engineering13-277-262-1275%32-33$9,774$8,352
10-24Michigan State University Forestry8-225-2112-2663%8-18$10,478NA
RankProgramRegres QualitySurvey QualityStudent OutcomesJobs at GradDiversityIn-State TuitionRoom Board
9-25Oregon State University Forest Resources14-279-272-1975%15-25$9,774$8,352
10-24Yale University Forestry and Environmental Studies1-43-116-2347%4-10$32,500NA
11-26North Carolina State University at Raleigh Forestry4-1413-2926-3268%11-22$4,408$8,760
9-27North Carolina State University at Raleigh Wood and Paper Science7-2411-293-2968%9-25$4,408$8,760
10-26Mississippi State University Forest Products (degree: PhD in Forest Resources)21-3110-281-1368%8-16$5,151$7,333
9-26Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Forest Products10-2912-302-1666%15-28$8,262$6,580
12-28University of Massachusetts Amherst Forest Resources15-3115-2913-3067%29-32$2,640NA
14-29University of Missouri-Columbia Forestry17-3111-301-2165%14-24$7,169NA
15-29Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus Forest Resources5-207-271-1755%28-32$15,446NA
14-29Texas A & M University Rangeland Ecology and Management7-2516-3116-2962%8-19$5,322$8,039
15-30Mississippi State University Forestry (degree: PhD in Forest Resources)26-3315-311-1568%31-33$5,151$7,333
19-30Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Forestry9-218-2616-2957%4-12$4,189$12,834
20-30University of Florida Forest Resources and Conservation11-2320-319-2754%3-5$8,108$8,170
24-31Colorado State University Forest, Rangeland, and Watershed Stewardship18-3022-3131-3265%5-14$6,464NA
25-32The University of Tennessee Natural Resources24-3325-3214-3067%23-30$6,826$6,750

Item Descriptions

Rank
A range indicating how this program ranked in 500 simulated rankings based on your priorities. Programs are sorted by their median rank. Learn more.
NRC regression-based quality measure (Regres Quality)
The NRC's measurements of overall program quality are based on 20 key variables (19 in the humanities) such as GRE scores, student support and faculty publications. To calculate the regression-based quality measure, the relative importance, or weight, of a variable was set by the extent that it correlated with programs viewed most favorably by evaluators in each field. Learn more. Your weight = 3. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
NRC survey-based quality measure (Survey Quality)
The NRC's measurements of overall program quality are based on 20 key variables (19 in the humanities) such as GRE scores, student support and faculty publications. To calculate the survey-based quality measure, evaluators in each field identified the variables that they considered to be the most important indicators of program quality. Learn more. Your weight = 5. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Student support and outcomes (Student Outcomes)
This variable is a composite of other measures of student support and outcomes, including 6-year or 8-year graduation rates (for non-humanities programs and humanities programs, respectively), time to degree, job placement within academia, percentage of first-year students with full financial support, and whether a program collects data about the employment outcomes of its graduates. The relative importance of these variables was determined by the direct assessments of some 50 faculty in each field. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Placement Rate (Jobs at Grad)
This variable shows the percentage of students with definite plans at graduation (either a job or a postdoctoral position), based on data from the student questionnaire. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: SED, 2000–2004)
Diversity in the academic environment (Diversity)
This variable shows a composite measure of diversity generated by the National Research Council. It includes data on percent of faculty and students from underrepresented minorities, percent of female faculty and students, and percent of international faculty and students. The relative importance of these variables was determined by the direct assessments of some 50 faculty in each field. Your weight = 1. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
In-State Graduate Tuition (In-State Tuition)
This variable shows the amount of tuition paid by graduate students who are permanent residents of the same state in which the program is based. Your weight = -2. Smaller values are better. (Source: IPEDS, 2009)
Off Campus Room and Board (Room Board)
This variable shows the estimated cost of housing and meals for a typical student sharing a room with one other student over the course of one academic year. Your weight = -2. Smaller values are better. (Source: IPEDS, 2009)

Data Sources

Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
IPEDS is an annual, comprehensive set of surveys of all colleges and universities in the United States. The surveys are conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics.   Learn more
National Research Council
The National Research Council conducts periodic assessments of doctoral programs in the United States. Our data comes from the most recent assessment in 2010.   Learn more
Survey of Earned Doctorates
The NSF/NIH/NEH/USED/USDA/NASA Survey of Earned Doctorates is an annual survey of all new recipients of doctorates from US universities at graduation. The average of the response rates for the 2000–2004 surveys was 92%.   Learn more
Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering
The Survey is an annual assessment of the number and characteristics of graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in science, engineering, and health-related fields It is conducted by the National Science Foundation.   Learn more
* Value is missing. The value shown is based on the average for other programs in the same field. Learn more.

The graduate school rankings on PhDs.org have been made possible by grants from The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and The Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
The National Postdoctoral Association and The Center for Science and the Media have served as the project's fiscal sponsors.