Ranking of History Graduate Schools

Find An Online Program Now

The rankings below have been generated using the priorities you set. You can change your priorities or get rankings for a different field.

About the rankings »

Your Ranking of History PhD Programs

Programs 1–30
RankProgramRegres QualitySurvey QualityResearch ProductFaculty GrantsFaculty AwardsStudent OutcomesProfes DevelStats InstructOrientIntl Orient
1-4Princeton University History1-71-31-3 30%12.31-1215NoYesYes
1-5Princeton University History of Science3-151-52-8 48%12.64-3716NoYesYes
1-6Yale University Medieval Studies9-232-92-8 36%11.21-6818YesYesYes
2-6Harvard University History1-81-51-6 22%11.44-3417NoYesYes
2-6University of Chicago History1-83-91-6 27%10.767-10117YesYesYes
5-10Johns Hopkins University History1-96-135-15 13%9.74-4218YesYesYes
5-13Yale University History of Medicine and Science14-268-228-21 35%8.46-7918YesYesYes
6-15University of Pennsylvania History8-175-144-15 28%4.67-5818YesYesYes
6-16University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill History11-178-209-23 30%7.055-9918YesYesYes
7-19Brandeis University American History20-367-206-18 36%6.35-5517NoYesYes
8-18University of Michigan-Ann Arbor History6-1412-2617-35 18%7.916-7218YesYesYes
8-19Columbia University in the City of New York History1-68-209-23 18%8.069-10916NoYesYes
8-18Harvard University History of Science16-322-64-14 19%6.64-3516NoYesYes
9-19University of California-Berkeley History4-1114-2726-52 24%6.015-6618YesYesYes
9-19New York University History7-146-1711-28 19%4.517-8218YesYesYes
RankProgramRegres QualitySurvey QualityResearch ProductFaculty GrantsFaculty AwardsStudent OutcomesProfes DevelStats InstructOrientIntl Orient
9-19Stanford University History2-89-2012-28 21%7.86-4013NoYesYes
9-20Yale University History7-1512-2521-44 18%6.14-4118YesYesYes
13-28University of California-Santa Barbara History28-457-194-16 26%2.242-9718YesYesYes
14-29Rutgers University-New Brunswick History13-219-2415-36 23%2.69-5917YesYesYes
16-32Duke University History15-2522-4328-53 22%5.418-8217YesYesYes
17-32University of California-Los Angeles History7-1520-3725-54 20%3.962-10018YesYesYes
18-37Arizona State University History32-5212-2810-31 23%2.322-7418YesYesYes
18-37Northwestern University History13-2324-4435-61 19%7.510-5615NoYesYes
19-37Brown University History32-5818-3513-33 22%3.616-8318YesYesYes
17-42Johns Hopkins University History of Medicine27-5124-5526-53 36%1.84-8017YesYesYes
17-42Johns Hopkins University History of Science and Technology27-5124-5526-53 36%1.84-8017YesYesYes
20-41University of Georgia History34-5619-4310-27 24%1.715-6918YesYesYes
21-41Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus History23-3720-3930-60 16%3.88-6018YesYesYes
20-40University of Notre Dame History24-3616-3215-35 23%3.46-3716NoYesYes
20-43SUNY at Binghamton History54-8728-5223-47 30%3.062-10018YesYesYes

Item Descriptions

Rank
A range indicating how this program ranked in 500 simulated rankings based on your priorities. Programs are sorted by their median rank. Learn more.
NRC regression-based quality measure (Regres Quality)
The NRC's measurements of overall program quality are based on 20 key variables (19 in the humanities) such as GRE scores, student support and faculty publications. To calculate the regression-based quality measure, the relative importance, or weight, of a variable was set by the extent that it correlated with programs viewed most favorably by evaluators in each field. Learn more. Your weight = 5. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
NRC survey-based quality measure (Survey Quality)
The NRC's measurements of overall program quality are based on 20 key variables (19 in the humanities) such as GRE scores, student support and faculty publications. To calculate the survey-based quality measure, evaluators in each field identified the variables that they considered to be the most important indicators of program quality. Learn more. Your weight = 4. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Overall research productivity (Research Product)
This variable shows a composite measure of research productivity, based on publications per faculty member, citations per publication, percent of faculty holding grants, and awards per faculty member. The relative importance of these variables was determined by the direct assessments of some 50 faculty in each field. Your weight = 4. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
% faculty with grants (Faculty Grants)
This variable shows the percentage of faculty members in the program whose work was supported by external grants or contracts in 2006, based on data from a faculty questionnaire. Your weight = 5. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Faculty awards (Faculty Awards)
This variable shows the average number of awards per faculty member in the program, based on data from a review of 1,393 awards and honors given by various scholarly organizations. The committee identified awards as "Highly Prestigious" or "Prestigious", with the former given a weight of 5. Award recipients were matched to the faculty in all programs. For each program, the number of awards for an individual faculty member was the sum of the weighted awards times the faculty member's allocation to that program. The variable shown here equals the sum of these individual values divided by the number of faculty allocated to the program. Your weight = 5. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Student support and outcomes (Student Outcomes)
This variable is a composite of other measures of student support and outcomes, including 6-year or 8-year graduation rates (for non-humanities programs and humanities programs, respectively), time to degree, job placement within academia, percentage of first-year students with full financial support, and whether a program collects data about the employment outcomes of its graduates. The relative importance of these variables was determined by the direct assessments of some 50 faculty in each field. Your weight = 3. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Professional development (Profes Devel)
This measure indicates the number of professional-development opportunities and oversight mechanisms for graduate students. In a 2006 questionnaire, programs indicated how many, out of a possible 18, resources existed for the support of doctoral students or doctoral education. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Instruction in statistics (Stats Instruct)
The program or institution provides instruction in statistics to graduate students (2006). Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Orientation for new graduate students (Orient)
The program or institution provides an orientation program for new graduate students (2006). Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Orientation for new international graduate students (Intl Orient)
The program or institution provides an orientation for new international graduate students (2006). Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)

Data Sources

Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
IPEDS is an annual, comprehensive set of surveys of all colleges and universities in the United States. The surveys are conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics.   Learn more
National Research Council
The National Research Council conducts periodic assessments of doctoral programs in the United States. Our data comes from the most recent assessment in 2010.   Learn more
Survey of Earned Doctorates
The NSF/NIH/NEH/USED/USDA/NASA Survey of Earned Doctorates is an annual survey of all new recipients of doctorates from US universities at graduation. The average of the response rates for the 2000–2004 surveys was 92%.   Learn more
Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering
The Survey is an annual assessment of the number and characteristics of graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in science, engineering, and health-related fields It is conducted by the National Science Foundation.   Learn more
* Value is missing. The value shown is based on the average for other programs in the same field. Learn more.

The graduate school rankings on PhDs.org have been made possible by grants from The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and The Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
The National Postdoctoral Association and The Center for Science and the Media have served as the project's fiscal sponsors.