Ranking of Operations Research, Systems Engineering, and Industrial Engineering Graduate Schools

Find An Online Program Now

The rankings below have been generated using the priorities you set. You can change your priorities or get rankings for a different field.

About the rankings »

Your Ranking of Operations Research, Systems Engineering, and Industrial Engineering PhD Programs

Programs 1–30
RankProgramRegres QualitySurvey QualityStudent OutcomesJobs at GradDiversityFemale StudentsFemale Faculty
1-2Stanford University Management Science and Engineering1-21-610-3089%41-60 31% 20%
2-5Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus Industrial Engineering1-31-712-3064%9-29 31% 20%
2-5Massachusetts Institute of Technology Operations Research2-41-52-1273%*29-53 29% 13%
2-7University of California-Berkeley Industrial Engineering and Operations Research3-101-1049-6178%5-14 38% 27%
3-12University of Michigan-Ann Arbor Industrial Operations and Engineering4-119-245-2487%27-51 36% 11%
4-13Carnegie Mellon University Operations Res/Information Systems/Manufacturing and Operating Systems4-173-103-1573%*35-59 23% 19%
4-14Northwestern University Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences4-121-96-2776%15-40 28% 6%
3-15University of Iowa Industrial Engineering11-378-278-2870%3-7 56% 11%
5-16Carnegie Mellon University Engineering and Public Policy8-283-157-2473%*28-55 40% 13%
6-16Cornell University Operations Research6-184-131-10NA35-59 22% 15%
5-17University of Illinois at Chicago Industrial Engineering and Operations Research35-626-1949-6456%1-3 60% 40%
6-19University of Washington-Seattle Campus Industrial Engineering24-5526-4849-6175%5-21 50% 47%
8-19University of Wisconsin-Madison Industrial Engineering6-2212-2934-5075%15-39 32% 24%
10-23Arizona State University Industrial Engineering11-347-2130-4866%14-36 25% 29%
10-25Purdue University-Main Campus Industrial Engineering6-228-2423-4775%9-26 25% 12%
RankProgramRegres QualitySurvey QualityStudent OutcomesJobs at GradDiversityFemale StudentsFemale Faculty
10-24University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus Industrial Engineering30-5517-391-878%15-41 44% 15%
8-23Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Industrial and Systems Engineering5-2816-3717-3276%12-35 33% 18%
9-28University of Nebraska-Lincoln Industrial and Management Systems Engineering28-658-281-2373%*1-2 25% 17%
12-29University of Florida Industrial and Systems Engineering12-408-315-3073%*15-38 27% 14%
12-29Iowa State University Industrial Engineering24-4928-4926-5154%3-10 62% 20%
14-27Princeton University Operations Research and Financial Engineering11-295-187-25NA19-43 21% 8%
15-28University of Pennsylvania Operations and Information Management5-2617-309-27NA42-64 23% 16%
17-32University at Buffalo Industrial Engineering27-5316-353-1583%13-35 28% 7%
16-31Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering7-238-2225-4162%18-41 23% 15%
19-36Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus Operations Research8-3014-2928-4862%15-44 36% 13%
18-34University of Massachusetts Amherst Industrial Engineering and Operations Research40-6727-5045-6298%*27-53 22% 29%
20-37Rutgers University-New Brunswick Industrial and Systems Engineering31-5222-4610-3077%12-35 26% 18%
19-41University of Maryland-College Park Reliability Engineering6-296-2650-65NA53-66 20% 18%
21-37University of Minnesota-Twin Cities Industrial and Systems Engineering37-6145-5713-3898%*18-46 25% 27%
22-39Lehigh University Industrial and Systems Engineering20-3931-5232-5293%33-59 35% 7%

Item Descriptions

Rank
A range indicating how this program ranked in 500 simulated rankings based on your priorities. Programs are sorted by their median rank. Learn more.
NRC regression-based quality measure (Regres Quality)
The NRC's measurements of overall program quality are based on 20 key variables (19 in the humanities) such as GRE scores, student support and faculty publications. To calculate the regression-based quality measure, the relative importance, or weight, of a variable was set by the extent that it correlated with programs viewed most favorably by evaluators in each field. Learn more. Your weight = 3. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
NRC survey-based quality measure (Survey Quality)
The NRC's measurements of overall program quality are based on 20 key variables (19 in the humanities) such as GRE scores, student support and faculty publications. To calculate the survey-based quality measure, evaluators in each field identified the variables that they considered to be the most important indicators of program quality. Learn more. Your weight = 5. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Student support and outcomes (Student Outcomes)
This variable is a composite of other measures of student support and outcomes, including 6-year or 8-year graduation rates (for non-humanities programs and humanities programs, respectively), time to degree, job placement within academia, percentage of first-year students with full financial support, and whether a program collects data about the employment outcomes of its graduates. The relative importance of these variables was determined by the direct assessments of some 50 faculty in each field. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Placement Rate (Jobs at Grad)
This variable shows the percentage of students with definite plans at graduation (either a job or a postdoctoral position), based on data from the student questionnaire. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: SED, 2000–2004)
Diversity in the academic environment (Diversity)
This variable shows a composite measure of diversity generated by the National Research Council. It includes data on percent of faculty and students from underrepresented minorities, percent of female faculty and students, and percent of international faculty and students. The relative importance of these variables was determined by the direct assessments of some 50 faculty in each field. Your weight = 1. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Percentage of female students (Female Students)
The percentage of female doctoral students Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Percentage of female faculty (Female Faculty)
This measure reports the percentage of female faculty members, based on data from a 2006 program questionnaire. Faculty allocations were not considered in the calculation. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)

Data Sources

Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
IPEDS is an annual, comprehensive set of surveys of all colleges and universities in the United States. The surveys are conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics.   Learn more
National Research Council
The National Research Council conducts periodic assessments of doctoral programs in the United States. Our data comes from the most recent assessment in 2010.   Learn more
Survey of Earned Doctorates
The NSF/NIH/NEH/USED/USDA/NASA Survey of Earned Doctorates is an annual survey of all new recipients of doctorates from US universities at graduation. The average of the response rates for the 2000–2004 surveys was 92%.   Learn more
Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering
The Survey is an annual assessment of the number and characteristics of graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in science, engineering, and health-related fields It is conducted by the National Science Foundation.   Learn more
* Value is missing. The value shown is based on the average for other programs in the same field. Learn more.

The graduate school rankings on PhDs.org have been made possible by grants from The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and The Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
The National Postdoctoral Association and The Center for Science and the Media have served as the project's fiscal sponsors.