Programs are ranked by their score, a weighted sum of the items you chose. (Details)
Descriptions of each item are listed at the bottom of the page. (You can also see a description
by mousing over items at the top of the table.)
Your weight for each item is shown beneath the item at the top of the table.
Weights range in magnitude from 0 (not important) to 5 (extremely important).
A positive weight means that you prefer larger values for the item.
A negative weight means that you prefer smaller values for the item.
Green values are at least one standard deviation
better than the mean.
Red values are at least one standard deviation
worse than the mean.
Do you think these rankings are useful?
If so, you can help spread the word by linking to phds.org from your own site or blog.
Here is a direct link to your ranking.
Here are some other ways to help us.
Your customized program score is a weighted sum of points for each item.
The weights were selected on this page.
For an item with importance weight W, a program receives W × S points
for being S standard deviations above average.
Larger values are better.
Program effectiveness in educating research scholars and scientists, 1993. Scale of 0 to 5, with 0 denoting "Not Effective" and 5 denoting "Extremely Effective."
Your weight = 5. Larger values are better.(NRC,
1995)
Scholarly quality of program faculty, 1993. Scale of 0 to 5, with 0 denoting "Not sufficient for doctoral education" and 5 denoting "Distinguished."
Your weight = 5. Larger values are better.(NRC,
1995)
Missing Values
Missing values have been replaced with the average value for all programs in the field.
The National Research Council conducts assessments of doctoral programs in the United States every 10 to 15 years). The data we use are from the most recent assessment, the 1995 study Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Learn more about the NRC study's methods here; order a copy here. The next NRC assessment is scheduled for release in Summer 2009. Learn more
The NSF/NIH/NEH/USED/USDA/NASA Survey of Earned Doctorates is an annual survey of all new recipients of doctorates from US universities at graduation. The average of the response rates for the 2000–2004 surveys was 92%. Learn more
The Survey is an annual assessment of the number and characteristics of graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in science, engineering, and health-related fields. It is conducted by the National Science Foundation. Learn more
*Value is missing. The value shown is based on the average for other programs in the same field. Learn more.
Your Score
A weighted sum of points for each item.
Weights were set on the previous page.
For an item with importance weight W, a program receives W × S points
for being S standard deviations above average.
Larger values are better.
Educational Effectiveness
Program effectiveness in educating research scholars and scientists, 1993. Scale of 0 to 5, with 0 denoting "Not Effective" and 5 denoting "Extremely Effective."
Your weight = 5. Larger values are better.
Source: NRC, 1995
Faculty Quality
Scholarly quality of program faculty, 1993. Scale of 0 to 5, with 0 denoting "Not sufficient for doctoral education" and 5 denoting "Distinguished."