Ranking of Physiology Graduate Schools

Find An Online Program Now

The rankings below have been generated using the priorities you set. You can change your priorities or get rankings for a different field.

About the rankings »

Your Ranking of Physiology PhD Programs

Programs 1–30
RankProgramRegres QualitySurvey QualityStudent OutcomesJobs at GradDiversityIn-State TuitionRoom Board
1-10Yale University Cellular and Molecular Physiology1-161-310-45100%22-43$32,500NA
1-10University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Cell and Molecular Physiology3-272-173-3192%17-41$5,413$8,670
1-14University of Iowa Molecular Physiology and Biophysics1-344-2629-56100%48-60$6,840$8,004
2-16Baylor College of Medicine Molecular Physiology and Biophysics9-404-257-3398%*3-7$11,000NA
1-17Kansas State University Anatomy and Physiology19-526-331-15100%25-43$6,718$5,373
1-17The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Cell and Regulatory Biology3-365-3212-4293%*4-10$3,942NA
2-17University of California-Los Angeles Molecular, Cell and Integrative Physiology1-101-1221-5171%8-19$7,836$10,241
2-21Loyola University Chicago Cell and Molecular Physiology8-512-181-1383%14-41$14,220NA
3-21University of Michigan-Ann Arbor Molecular and Integrative Physiology2-222-118-3661%11-29$17,286$8,924
3-27Vanderbilt University Molecular Physiology and Biophysics1-161-157-3589%25-45$37,632NA
5-29The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Cell and Regulatory Biology3-365-3212-42NA4-10NANA
4-26University of Colorado at Boulder Integrative Physiology7-396-301-1690%29-47$8,190NA
5-28University of Alabama at Birmingham Cellular and Molecular Physiology18-4613-442-2895%13-34$4,086$8,969
6-37Johns Hopkins University Cellular and Molecular Physiology2-321-1420-4893%*38-56$39,150NA
6-33University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Molecular and Integrative Physiology2-284-2650-6377%13-34$9,318NA
RankProgramRegres QualitySurvey QualityStudent OutcomesJobs at GradDiversityIn-State TuitionRoom Board
8-35University of Kansas Molecular and Integrative Physiology21-5219-5034-53100%16-41$6,492$6,854
7-34Wake Forest University Physiology Pharmacology10-396-344-2593%*14-36$30,358NA
9-35Stony Brook University Physiology and Biophysics4-318-3736-5798%*43-59$8,370$11,288
9-40University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Veterinary Biosciences9-569-3447-6377%2-2$9,318NA
8-35University of Kentucky Physiology10-429-398-4279%11-33$7,869$9,100
8-35University of Missouri-Columbia Physiology (Medicine)12-4711-409-4087%13-36$7,169NA
10-38Pennsylvania State University-College of Medicine Physiology4-359-3718-45NA41-54$15,446NA
12-40University of Florida Medical Sciences: Physiology and Pharmacology1-318-344-2659%35-56$8,108$8,170
11-42Oregon Health & Science University Physiology and Pharmacology5-4113-4519-5093%*23-49$18,144NA
11-42University of Virginia-Main Campus Physiology5-346-3029-5780%45-59$10,452NA
11-43University of Wisconsin-Madison Endocrinology-Reproductive Physiology10-5014-4727-5282%8-19$9,500$8,040
13-42University of Wisconsin-Madison Physiology13-4314-4618-4282%29-45$9,500$8,040
13-43University of Arizona Physiological Sciences10-3915-476-3487%20-41$7,330$11,234
15-43University of Miami Physiology and Biophysics9-4210-385-2978%4-9$26,640NA
16-44University of Washington-Seattle Campus Physiology and Biophysics3-2510-3936-5688%41-58$10,160$12,876

Item Descriptions

Rank
A range indicating how this program ranked in 500 simulated rankings based on your priorities. Programs are sorted by their median rank. Learn more.
NRC regression-based quality measure (Regres Quality)
The NRC's measurements of overall program quality are based on 20 key variables (19 in the humanities) such as GRE scores, student support and faculty publications. To calculate the regression-based quality measure, the relative importance, or weight, of a variable was set by the extent that it correlated with programs viewed most favorably by evaluators in each field. Learn more. Your weight = 3. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
NRC survey-based quality measure (Survey Quality)
The NRC's measurements of overall program quality are based on 20 key variables (19 in the humanities) such as GRE scores, student support and faculty publications. To calculate the survey-based quality measure, evaluators in each field identified the variables that they considered to be the most important indicators of program quality. Learn more. Your weight = 5. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Student support and outcomes (Student Outcomes)
This variable is a composite of other measures of student support and outcomes, including 6-year or 8-year graduation rates (for non-humanities programs and humanities programs, respectively), time to degree, job placement within academia, percentage of first-year students with full financial support, and whether a program collects data about the employment outcomes of its graduates. The relative importance of these variables was determined by the direct assessments of some 50 faculty in each field. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
Placement Rate (Jobs at Grad)
This variable shows the percentage of students with definite plans at graduation (either a job or a postdoctoral position), based on data from the student questionnaire. Your weight = 2. Larger values are better. (Source: SED, 2000–2004)
Diversity in the academic environment (Diversity)
This variable shows a composite measure of diversity generated by the National Research Council. It includes data on percent of faculty and students from underrepresented minorities, percent of female faculty and students, and percent of international faculty and students. The relative importance of these variables was determined by the direct assessments of some 50 faculty in each field. Your weight = 1. Larger values are better. (Source: NRC, 2010)
In-State Graduate Tuition (In-State Tuition)
This variable shows the amount of tuition paid by graduate students who are permanent residents of the same state in which the program is based. Your weight = -2. Smaller values are better. (Source: IPEDS, 2009)
Off Campus Room and Board (Room Board)
This variable shows the estimated cost of housing and meals for a typical student sharing a room with one other student over the course of one academic year. Your weight = -2. Smaller values are better. (Source: IPEDS, 2009)

Data Sources

Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
IPEDS is an annual, comprehensive set of surveys of all colleges and universities in the United States. The surveys are conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics.   Learn more
National Research Council
The National Research Council conducts periodic assessments of doctoral programs in the United States. Our data comes from the most recent assessment in 2010.   Learn more
Survey of Earned Doctorates
The NSF/NIH/NEH/USED/USDA/NASA Survey of Earned Doctorates is an annual survey of all new recipients of doctorates from US universities at graduation. The average of the response rates for the 2000–2004 surveys was 92%.   Learn more
Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering
The Survey is an annual assessment of the number and characteristics of graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in science, engineering, and health-related fields It is conducted by the National Science Foundation.   Learn more
* Value is missing. The value shown is based on the average for other programs in the same field. Learn more.

The graduate school rankings on PhDs.org have been made possible by grants from The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and The Burroughs Wellcome Fund.
The National Postdoctoral Association and The Center for Science and the Media have served as the project's fiscal sponsors.